The Best of Social Anarchism :

Fetishizing Process

The full article is not available online, but the summary abstract is included below for reference.

Twenty years after Estes, Mark Lance revisited the concept and practice of consensus at a level both deeper in theory and practical description. Where Estes’ provides an introduction, Lance offers a fuller analysis. His position in the Department of Philosophy at Georgetown University affords him a good philosophical background, and the department itself provides him with a working decision-making group. Lance draws an important distinction between procedures, which dictate the rules of decision-making, and practices, which are the methods by which issues are raised and proposed solutions are discussed. Ultimately, he argues that specific procedures — especially consensus vs. supermajority rule — are substantially less significant as long as the practice is open, inclusive, and respectful.

Originally published in issue 38.

Leave a comment

  • Anonymous Poster
  • Enter the following number into the box:


  • Re: Fetishizing Process

    I was able to read the whole content, all I can say is this is great! Great post with great ideas with great ideas with a great concept and with such a great writer. A written perfectly and hot and cold was very much easy to understand.